Friday, July 03, 2009
Well..
Some seems to believe we were running a "youth recreation centre" here with idiots, psychopaths, mass murderers, sick manipulative behavior and weapon dealers "defusing tensions" world wide, while this whole planet very much know people like Kurds, Iranians and Tamils have struggle for decades for their basic human rights!
Thursday, July 02, 2009
So...
After the world wide genocidal "war-fare" carousel was instigated ones again at the expense of the Kurds and people all over this planet and 60 years of courageous Palestinians living on a rocket social wealth fare system in the same carousel where both they, the Kurds, the Iranians, the Tamils and YOU #¤## NAME IT are committed both genocides and politicides on, it´s maybe time for Israel to serious start working with the Palestinians so they can achieve their right to self determination! Just as Turkey with the Kurds!
Information and disinformation can go two ways..
"Possible fakes accounts and may have connections to the Iranian Security apparatus"
http://twitspam.org/?p=1403
http://twitspam.org/?p=1403
Genocide is a process
1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania or Cote d’Ivoire has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.
2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply them to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to the next stage, dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code-words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Denmark, when many Danes chose to wear the yellow star, depriving it of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3.DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than in democracies. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.
4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or by terrorist groups. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations.
5.POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas denied to them.
Coups d’etat by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
6.IDENTIFICATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. They are often segregated into ghettoes, forced into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Alert must be called. If the political will of the U.S. Government, NATO, and the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance to the victim group in preparing for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees.
7.EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade -- 5500 heavy infantry -- should be mobilized by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N., should intervene. It is time for nations to recognize that the international law of humanitarian intervention transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If NATO will not intervene directly, it should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene with U.N. authorization.
8. DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence is heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the International Criminal Court may not deter the worst killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice. And such courts may deter future potential genocidists who can never again share Hitler’s expectation of impunity when he sneered,”Who, after all, remembers the Armenians?”
2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply them to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to the next stage, dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code-words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Denmark, when many Danes chose to wear the yellow star, depriving it of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3.DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than in democracies. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.
4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or by terrorist groups. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations.
5.POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas denied to them.
Coups d’etat by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
6.IDENTIFICATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. They are often segregated into ghettoes, forced into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. At this stage, a Genocide Alert must be called. If the political will of the U.S. Government, NATO, and the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance to the victim group in preparing for its self-defense. Otherwise, at least humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees.
7.EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade -- 5500 heavy infantry -- should be mobilized by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N., should intervene. It is time for nations to recognize that the international law of humanitarian intervention transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If NATO will not intervene directly, it should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene with U.N. authorization.
8. DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence is heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the International Criminal Court may not deter the worst killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice. And such courts may deter future potential genocidists who can never again share Hitler’s expectation of impunity when he sneered,”Who, after all, remembers the Armenians?”
Inner City Press (ICP) reported Tuesday that after a week of silence by the U.N. the U.N. spokesperson has revealed that "U.N. has hired a lawyer who has visited the U.N. staff and who are still detained in Colombo. Kandasamy "Saundi" Saundrarajan of UNOPS (Office of Project Services) and N. Charles Raveendran of UNHCR taken by the Sri Lanka Government and are under detention for more than a month.
"The head of the UN Refugee Agency in Sri Lanka Amin Awad issued a strange statement saying in essence that the government is free to detain staff as long as procedures are followed. But despite top UN humanitarian John Holmes' statement that unlike international staff, national staff members of the UN are not immune, the Staff Union disagrees. They criticize Awad's statement, and counter that national staff have immunity within the scope of their work," ICP said in its report.When "lawyers in Sri Lanka who represent those accused of Tamil Tiger sympathies have themselves been labeled as traitors by the country's military," and the "UN has already shown it cannot protect its own staff in Sri Lanka," the Inner City Press questioned if the U.N. will be able to "protect the lawyers it hires for its staff?"
http://www.tamilnet.com/
"Genocide Watch is the Coordinator of the International Campaign to End Genocide1804 “S” St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 USA"
Well..Yeah..It´s put in system..Isn´t it..A genocidal system..In fact!
..A genocidal system..where one can find all the 8 categories, methods and stages for genocide..Just as in Turkey and Sri Lanka..In fact! It´s starts with some wining about journalists in Qom and ends up with "elections" where youths are taken to the streets just to be identified, "sorted out", jailed and eleminated...as the "enemies of God", hooligans or some other categories to distinguish people into “us and them” where people are in fact harassed by the REAL terrorists and hooligans that are truly the ones roaming the streets, killing and destroying properties and universities..Doesn´t it..
Very civilized..And it doesn´t matter if it´s "elections", Winter, Spring , Monday, Thursday 1999, 2009 or what ever...Does it..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQxtuGdnW0I&eurl
Well..Yeah..We thought so..The same mobile Hezbollah that have been used in crimes against your own people for decades..
The leading contender of the “reformist” camp in Iran’s presidential elections, former Prime Minister Mir Hossein Mousavi Khameneh, was a founder of Hezbollah and a key architect of the Islamic Republic’s dreaded intelligence services. Mousavi was “one of the architects of the Ministry of Intelligence and Information” when it was established in 1984. That ministry, also referred to as MOIS, was modeled closely after the KGB and was established with the help of Soviet advisers. Like its predecessor, SAVAK, the MOIS plays a key role in suppressing domestic dissent. It recruits informers, arrests critics of the regime, and tortures them brutally in special political prisons. MOIS also has been involved in murdering Iranian dissidents overseas and has been cited as a key player in terrorism cases from Germany to Argentina. In 2007, Interpol issued its third arrest warrant for former Intelligence Minister Ali Fallahian on terrorism charges. Fallahian is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.
“Mir Hossein Mousavi was one of the founders of Hezbollah. Ayatollah Khomeini put him on the Hezollah leadership council when the group was created in 1982-1983." Once Iran created Hezbollah in 1983, Mousavi coordinated the financing for it as the head of the Bonyad Mostazafan, which he chaired as prime minister. Working with Mehdi Hashemian, a deputy oil minister, Mousavi set up a scheme so that Hezbollah would get a share of Iranian oil sales. Hashemian is a cousin of then-parliament speaker Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani. Under the scheme, Hashemian established front companies for the oil transactions in France, Germany, and Cyprus, and the banks would do the rest, putting commissions into the Hezbollah accounts under fictitious names.
The Bonyad-e Mostazafan, known as the Foundation of the Oppressed, or the Alavi Foundation, was created from the vast real estate and corporate holdings of the former shah of Iran, and is under the direct control of the supreme leader. The Bonyad-e Mostazafan makes purchases for several hundred companies in Iran and buys equipment for the Iranian nuclear weapon, chemical/biological weapon and missile programs, according to the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. Western intelligence agencies have cited the foundation, and a sister organization known as the Martyrs Foundation, as a major funding source for Iranian-backed terrorist groups.
For many years the Martyrs Foundation was run by Hojjat-ol-Eslam Mehdi Karoubi, another self-styled “reformist” candidate in the presidential election. Mir-Hossein Mousavi comes from a large clan, and is said to be a younger half-brother of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The Mousavi family originally was Arabic and claims to descend from the seventh of the 12 Shiite imams, Musa al-Kazim ibn Jafar as Sadiq. The founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini, was also a member of the extended clan, as was Abbas Mousavi, a Hezbollah secretary general killed in Lebanon in an Israeli missile strike on Feb. 16, 1992.
Mousavi was prime minister at the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988 when tens of thousands of political prisoners were murdered in cold blood on the orders of Ayatollah Khomeini. Pro-democracy groups have called on Iranians to boycott the elections, with one saying, “This is a selection, not an election.”
It´s like telling your youths to get out and protest just to have your mobile Hezbollahs targeting them..To get justifications to implement more restrictions, oppression eliminations and gain more control..Like it´s been done for decades..Isn´t it..
“Mir Hossein Mousavi was one of the founders of Hezbollah. Ayatollah Khomeini put him on the Hezollah leadership council when the group was created in 1982-1983." Once Iran created Hezbollah in 1983, Mousavi coordinated the financing for it as the head of the Bonyad Mostazafan, which he chaired as prime minister. Working with Mehdi Hashemian, a deputy oil minister, Mousavi set up a scheme so that Hezbollah would get a share of Iranian oil sales. Hashemian is a cousin of then-parliament speaker Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani. Under the scheme, Hashemian established front companies for the oil transactions in France, Germany, and Cyprus, and the banks would do the rest, putting commissions into the Hezbollah accounts under fictitious names.
The Bonyad-e Mostazafan, known as the Foundation of the Oppressed, or the Alavi Foundation, was created from the vast real estate and corporate holdings of the former shah of Iran, and is under the direct control of the supreme leader. The Bonyad-e Mostazafan makes purchases for several hundred companies in Iran and buys equipment for the Iranian nuclear weapon, chemical/biological weapon and missile programs, according to the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. Western intelligence agencies have cited the foundation, and a sister organization known as the Martyrs Foundation, as a major funding source for Iranian-backed terrorist groups.
For many years the Martyrs Foundation was run by Hojjat-ol-Eslam Mehdi Karoubi, another self-styled “reformist” candidate in the presidential election. Mir-Hossein Mousavi comes from a large clan, and is said to be a younger half-brother of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The Mousavi family originally was Arabic and claims to descend from the seventh of the 12 Shiite imams, Musa al-Kazim ibn Jafar as Sadiq. The founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini, was also a member of the extended clan, as was Abbas Mousavi, a Hezbollah secretary general killed in Lebanon in an Israeli missile strike on Feb. 16, 1992.
Mousavi was prime minister at the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988 when tens of thousands of political prisoners were murdered in cold blood on the orders of Ayatollah Khomeini. Pro-democracy groups have called on Iranians to boycott the elections, with one saying, “This is a selection, not an election.”
It´s like telling your youths to get out and protest just to have your mobile Hezbollahs targeting them..To get justifications to implement more restrictions, oppression eliminations and gain more control..Like it´s been done for decades..Isn´t it..
Time to take off anything green..After all they are all Iranians..
A Revolutionary Guard commander who had played an active role in killing people and arresting protesters in recent days in Karaj, west of Tehran, was attacked and beaten by local people on Tuesday. Mahmoud Dadgou who also heads Karaj City Council was directly involved in the suppression of the popular uprising in Karaj. According to reports from Karaj, he is in critical condition.
The mullahs’ regime on Wednesday hanged six people in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison. The regime’s Judiciary gave no details of their identities or charges. The regime on Monday set up a three-man committee comprised of leading henchmen of the regime to see to the files of those arrested in the course of the Iranian people’s nationwide uprising. The members of this committee are among the key officials responsible for the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in summer of 1988 and the chain murders in the late 1990s.
Last Friday, mullah Ahmad Khatami, a member of the regime’s Assembly of Experts, said that protestors had “waged war on God” and urged authorities to “deal with them until they are completely eradicated”.
These executions, which are meant to spread fear and counter the Iranian people’s anger and discontent, will not resolve the very many crises the regime is facing. The Iranian Resistance urges all governments and international human rights organizations, in particular the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, to end their inaction towards the brutal crimes of the regime and instead condemn it and adopt urgent measures to bring a halt to the executions.
Some 20 young male and female protesters arrested in the course of unrests in recent days in Tehran were put together in a cell not bigger than 5x5 m. “Every half hour the Revolutionary Guards came to our cell beating everyone,” one said and added, “sometimes they took individual detainees for hours of interrogation, describing the prison state as appalling.
A unit of the special anti-riot force on Tuesday launched a brutal attack in the western Tehran district of Vali-Asr and arrested a number of young people. The young people were taken to an unknown location, and there is no further information about their fate. Revolutionary Guards and Basij paramilitary forces were dispatched on Wednesday from various military bases across Tehran to main squares and high streets. The suppressive forces started moving at midday to Baharestan Square facing the regime’s parliament, and Toopkhaneh and Imam Hossein squares. Some were also dispatched to Vanak and Enghelab squares. Government employees’ buses were used to transfer the forces to avoid drawing attention. In Enghelab and Vali-e Asr squares the State Security Forces (SSF) have been patrolling since 2:00pm. The number of people on the streets was growing and the regime’s agents did not allow any gatherings.
1.CLASSIFICATION: Categories to distinguish people into “us and them”
2. SYMBOLIZATION: Names or other symbols to the classifications, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply them to members of groups. Combat symbolization, group marking like gang clothing. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Denmark, when many Danes chose to wear the yellow star, depriving it of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3.DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated such as hooligans or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than in democracies.
4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally mobs led by local militants or by terrorist groups. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations.
5.POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas denied to them. Coups d’etat by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
6.IDENTIFICATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols.
7. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. It is time for nations to recognize that the international law of humanitarian intervention transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If NATO will not intervene directly, it should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene with U.N. authorization.
8.DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the International Criminal Court with the political will to arrest and prosecute them. And such courts may deter future potential genocidists who can never again share Hitler’s expectation of impunity when he sneered,”Who, after all, remembers the Armenians?”
The mullahs’ regime on Wednesday hanged six people in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison. The regime’s Judiciary gave no details of their identities or charges. The regime on Monday set up a three-man committee comprised of leading henchmen of the regime to see to the files of those arrested in the course of the Iranian people’s nationwide uprising. The members of this committee are among the key officials responsible for the massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in summer of 1988 and the chain murders in the late 1990s.
Last Friday, mullah Ahmad Khatami, a member of the regime’s Assembly of Experts, said that protestors had “waged war on God” and urged authorities to “deal with them until they are completely eradicated”.
These executions, which are meant to spread fear and counter the Iranian people’s anger and discontent, will not resolve the very many crises the regime is facing. The Iranian Resistance urges all governments and international human rights organizations, in particular the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, to end their inaction towards the brutal crimes of the regime and instead condemn it and adopt urgent measures to bring a halt to the executions.
Some 20 young male and female protesters arrested in the course of unrests in recent days in Tehran were put together in a cell not bigger than 5x5 m. “Every half hour the Revolutionary Guards came to our cell beating everyone,” one said and added, “sometimes they took individual detainees for hours of interrogation, describing the prison state as appalling.
A unit of the special anti-riot force on Tuesday launched a brutal attack in the western Tehran district of Vali-Asr and arrested a number of young people. The young people were taken to an unknown location, and there is no further information about their fate. Revolutionary Guards and Basij paramilitary forces were dispatched on Wednesday from various military bases across Tehran to main squares and high streets. The suppressive forces started moving at midday to Baharestan Square facing the regime’s parliament, and Toopkhaneh and Imam Hossein squares. Some were also dispatched to Vanak and Enghelab squares. Government employees’ buses were used to transfer the forces to avoid drawing attention. In Enghelab and Vali-e Asr squares the State Security Forces (SSF) have been patrolling since 2:00pm. The number of people on the streets was growing and the regime’s agents did not allow any gatherings.
1.CLASSIFICATION: Categories to distinguish people into “us and them”
2. SYMBOLIZATION: Names or other symbols to the classifications, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply them to members of groups. Combat symbolization, group marking like gang clothing. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Denmark, when many Danes chose to wear the yellow star, depriving it of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3.DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated such as hooligans or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than in democracies.
4. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally mobs led by local militants or by terrorist groups. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations.
5.POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas denied to them. Coups d’etat by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
6.IDENTIFICATION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols.
7. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. It is time for nations to recognize that the international law of humanitarian intervention transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If NATO will not intervene directly, it should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene with U.N. authorization.
8.DENIAL is the eighth stage that always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the International Criminal Court with the political will to arrest and prosecute them. And such courts may deter future potential genocidists who can never again share Hitler’s expectation of impunity when he sneered,”Who, after all, remembers the Armenians?”
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Yeah..And they all voted for Ahmadinejad..*Not*
Tehran's Evin prison filled with protestors
NCRI -The Iranian regime has filled the notorious Ward 209 of the Evin prison which is run by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and it is uniquely designed to hold political prisoners is jammed with protestors picked up by the security agents. “The cells in the block which normally hold only 1 or 2 prisoners now are housing 5 to 6 prisoners,” a report says. Currently there are over 700 detainees, mostly youths who participated in recent protests, in Ward 8 of the prison. The facility has the capacity of 170. The prisoners of Ward 8 have been transferred to Ward 7. Alborz, the main cell block of an infamous ward known as Quarantine is now holding over 2000 fresh prisoners. The solitary confinements in Ward 240 and Ward 241 are now holding more than three prisoners.
Maryam Rajavi warns of execution of detainees. Tuesday, 30 June 2009 - Regime forms 3-man committee to deal with detainees of uprising.
Mullah Mahmoud Hashemi-Shahroudi, the notorious head of the regime’s Judiciary, has set up a three-man committee to deal with those arrested in the course of the Iranian people’s nationwide uprising. The regime’s state television said on Monday that the committee would consist of Prosecutor-General mullah Ghorbanali Dorri-Najafabadi, General Inspection Organization Director Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi, and First Deputy Judiciary chief Ebrahim Reissi.
This new committee is reminiscent of the “Death Committee” founded by Khomeini in 1988 which in the space of a few weeks ordered the execution of 30,000 political prisoners. Pour-Mohammadi and Raissi were both members of the “Death Committee”. Pour-Mohammadi, a former Interior Ministry under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was at the time of the massacre a deputy Intelligence Minister and played the greatest role in carrying out Khomeini’s order for the massacre of political prisoners.
Dorri-Najafabadi, a former Intelligence Minister, is responsible for many killings and crimes in this regime, including the chain murders of political opponents in the late 1990s which took place while he was minister. All three members of the new committee have committed crimes against humanity.
Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, warned of the possibility that detainees of the Iranian people’s uprising would be executed and said that the mullahs’ Supreme Leader is trying to save himself and his regime from the people’s wrath through executions, killings, and spread of fear and terror.
Mrs. Rajavi called on the UN Secretary General and Security Council to condemn the crimes of the mullahs’ regime and refer the criminal file of those responsible for executions, killings and suppression, which include Ali Khamenei, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Shahroudi, Dorri-Najafabadi, Pour-Mohammadi and Raissi, to an international tribunal.
Mullah Ahmad Khatami, a member of the mullahs’ Assembly of Experts, in a sermon on June 26 said those arrested had “waged war on God”, and he urged the Judiciary to execute them.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
June 30, 2009
NCRI -The Iranian regime has filled the notorious Ward 209 of the Evin prison which is run by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and it is uniquely designed to hold political prisoners is jammed with protestors picked up by the security agents. “The cells in the block which normally hold only 1 or 2 prisoners now are housing 5 to 6 prisoners,” a report says. Currently there are over 700 detainees, mostly youths who participated in recent protests, in Ward 8 of the prison. The facility has the capacity of 170. The prisoners of Ward 8 have been transferred to Ward 7. Alborz, the main cell block of an infamous ward known as Quarantine is now holding over 2000 fresh prisoners. The solitary confinements in Ward 240 and Ward 241 are now holding more than three prisoners.
Maryam Rajavi warns of execution of detainees. Tuesday, 30 June 2009 - Regime forms 3-man committee to deal with detainees of uprising.
Mullah Mahmoud Hashemi-Shahroudi, the notorious head of the regime’s Judiciary, has set up a three-man committee to deal with those arrested in the course of the Iranian people’s nationwide uprising. The regime’s state television said on Monday that the committee would consist of Prosecutor-General mullah Ghorbanali Dorri-Najafabadi, General Inspection Organization Director Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi, and First Deputy Judiciary chief Ebrahim Reissi.
This new committee is reminiscent of the “Death Committee” founded by Khomeini in 1988 which in the space of a few weeks ordered the execution of 30,000 political prisoners. Pour-Mohammadi and Raissi were both members of the “Death Committee”. Pour-Mohammadi, a former Interior Ministry under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was at the time of the massacre a deputy Intelligence Minister and played the greatest role in carrying out Khomeini’s order for the massacre of political prisoners.
Dorri-Najafabadi, a former Intelligence Minister, is responsible for many killings and crimes in this regime, including the chain murders of political opponents in the late 1990s which took place while he was minister. All three members of the new committee have committed crimes against humanity.
Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, warned of the possibility that detainees of the Iranian people’s uprising would be executed and said that the mullahs’ Supreme Leader is trying to save himself and his regime from the people’s wrath through executions, killings, and spread of fear and terror.
Mrs. Rajavi called on the UN Secretary General and Security Council to condemn the crimes of the mullahs’ regime and refer the criminal file of those responsible for executions, killings and suppression, which include Ali Khamenei, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Shahroudi, Dorri-Najafabadi, Pour-Mohammadi and Raissi, to an international tribunal.
Mullah Ahmad Khatami, a member of the mullahs’ Assembly of Experts, in a sermon on June 26 said those arrested had “waged war on God”, and he urged the Judiciary to execute them.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
June 30, 2009
An Open Letter to President Barack Obama
Dear President Obama, In just a few days we will mark the tenth anniversary of the student uprisings in Iran that cracked the door open for the protests we are seeing today in response to the June 12, 2009, elections in Iran. I was part of that student movement. I spent several months in Iranian prisons before I was released and fled the country. Over the last several weeks I have spent many hours meeting with Iranians. The question we have all been asking one another repeatedly is, "Where is Obama Now?" I followed your campaign and election, and though I'm not a U.S. citizen, as the founder of an international student organization, Global Student Alliance, I endorsed your run for the presidency. What was most appealing to me and many like me, is that you took a stand on human rights. As you must know, human rights in Iran do not exist under the rule of the ayatollahs who have controlled the country for the last thirty years. This isn't to say that Iran's record prior to the revolution of 1979 was without a need for vast improvement, but nothing can compare to the barbaric treatment of Iran's citizens under the Islamic Republic's rule.
The protesters who are at this very moment disappearing from their homes at an alarming rate, face a terror that is unfathomable. I have lived a version of what they are going through, and I can tell you firsthand that those of us who have been tortured in Iranian prisons will live the rest of our lives with the physical and mental scars we incurred at the hands of our torturers. Those being arrested at this time are being used as examples, and they face the most vicious treatment. As ugly as it is, I feel as someone who lived through this that I must give you a view of what current prisoners face. It is likely that the capture will include a fairly violent beating before prisoners have been taken into the jail.
Next the questioning will begin. Prisoners will be interrogated night and day, and many will lose touch with time, not even knowing how many days have passed. The torturers will likely use one of their most common torture methods, beating the bottoms of prisoners' feet with some a plastic cord. When I first heard about this sort of torture before I experienced it, I couldn’t imagine that hitting the bottoms of the feet could cause such pain. In reality there are so many nerve ending in the feet that after the first couple of blows, the pain is no longer centralized in the feet but goes all over the body. They will question the prisoners between blows asking for names of others who worked against Islam. They will sit on their backs as they continue beating their feet. After each session they will take the victims outside where they will be forced to jump on their throbbing bloody feet for twenty minutes or more. This is done so that blood comes back into the feet and the healing begins. The torturers believe that as the body begins to regenerate, it ensures that the next beatings will be even more painful than the last. The torture rooms are often intentionally kept dark and along the top of the walls they will have a large metal pipe that runs the length of the ceiling and is sturdy enough to hold the weight of the prisoner. This was where they practice a torture method called Ghapani. The victim puts one arm over his or her shoulder, reaches around and grabs the other wrist from the waist. The wrists are then secured, either with a rope or handcuffs, and the victim is hung from the ceiling by the wrists. The pain is excruciating. There are no words to describe it. Between these beatings prisoners will be placed in solitary confinement to await their next interrogation. The cells are usually nothing more than small closets with a single light bulb hanging from the ceiling that burns 24 hours a day.
A favorite means of psychological torture is to make prisoners watch the torture sessions of their friends and family. I recall a brother and sister who were in Tohid Prison with me (a prison that has since been closed and made into a museum), and the brother was forced to watch as his sister was repeatedly raped. I was in jail with two close friends, Manouchehr and Akbar Mohammadi. The interrogators would often have us watch each other being tortured. Akbar died in Evin Prison in 2006. In the end, I lost many friends who were seeking non-violence and a secular, democratic Iran, at hands of Iran’s prison system. As gruesome as the images are that I have just described, I believe a president who believes in protecting human rights must have an understanding of what is at stake, and for this reason I have shared my experiences.
Over the last few weeks I’ve been concerned by your reaction to the happenings in Iran. In all honesty, my sense is that you don’t have very strong advisors on Iran, or that those you do have are part of a political agenda that you may not completely grasp. I mean no disrespect by this, Mr. President, but I ask that you take a look at a few of the actions that in my mind, and in the minds of many Iranians, seems lacking focus or understanding about the current situation in Iran:
1. Letter to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Many in the Iranian community were shocked that an American president would send a letter to the Supreme Leader in the weeks preceding the election. While the content of the letter is still unclear, the message it sent to our community was that it didn’t matter who won, the U.S. would work with them. Given the outcome of the elections and the obvious fraud that took place, it would seem that the regime was given a carte blanche go-ahead to do whatever they wanted in the election, and that the U.S. would bless their actions. I hope this wasn’t the actual message, but surely, President Obama, you must admit that this was strategically the wrong message to send to the citizens of Iran who face the basiji thugs in the streets of Iran in the name of freedom and democracy.
2. Invitation of Iranian Diplomats to U.S. Embassy Fourth of July Parties: Several weeks back a cable went out to all U.S. Embassies and Consulates, saying the U.S. diplomats could invite their counterparts from the Islamic Republic of Iran to their Fourth of July celebrations. The invitations have since been retracted—in an of itself an Iranian cultural faux pas that is considered rude at best. The real issue here is, Mr. President, how could anyone have advised you that inviting the Islamic Republic of Iran to a celebration of Independence Day in the U.S. was a good idea? This is a fundamentalist regime that has no respect for human rights or independence of any kind. The message that these invitations sent to the Iranian people is that the U.S. accepts the regime and all its cruelty.
3. U.S. President’s Reaction to Khamenei’s June 19 Declaration: During Friday prayers on June 19, 2009, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issued a warning to peaceful protesters that they would not be tolerated. This warning was in truth, a death sentence to protesters. It gave basiji thugs the go-ahead to shoot protesters at will and take prisoners based on little or no evidence. Mr. President, you must have known what this proclamation meant to human rights in Iran, yet your reaction was tepid at best. You issued a statement that you were “very concerned,” while reporters had to literally pull details out of your spokesman, Robert Gibb, who finally conceded that you “condemned the violence” used against protesters.
Mr. President, people are being flung off of bridges, shot with hunting rifles from rooftops and beaten with clubs and axes until their bones are broken and they are bleeding in the streets. The injured are being taken from hospitals and put in prisons, and basijisare pulling people from their homes in the middle of the night to be taken in for hours of questioning and torture.
Thousands of innocent people who are starved for democracy and freedom are sitting in prisons, unsure of their futures, unsure if they will live another day. They are young, old, male, female, upper, middle and working class, educated, uneducated, and illiterate. They are professors, doctors, bazaaris, and laborers. The cruelty of the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran cares not at all for their background, but rules with equality when it comes to its barbaric acts against its citizens.
President Obama, please take a moment to consider the following: 1. For the last eight years the U.S. president repeatedly said he supported the people of Iran, but behind that support was an unspoken threat of military violence. He grouped our country as part of the “Axis of Evil” to justify veiled threats that “All options were on the table.” I did not support military action against my country then, and I still don’t today. In July of 2006 I was the first Iranian to organize an anti-war against Iran rally. But three years later, some sort of protection must be offered to the innocent people on the streets of Iran. This is the job of the United Nations, yet Ban Ki-Moon has been no stronger in his call to action than you have. Mr. President, you must push the U.N. on this. It is a human rights issue, and if Ban Ki-Moon is following your lead, it is imperative to remind him of the very charter of the U.N. to promote peace, freedom and "reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights."
2. The U.S. cannot recognize the fraudulent elections of June 12, 2009. Mahmoud Ahmadenejad is not the elected president, and for the U.S. to respond to him as such gives further strength to Khamenei’s dictatorship.
3. Mr. President, you must take this opportunity to evaluate your team of advisors on Iran policy. In this country we literally have the best and brightest academic minds from Iran. These are people who were born in Iran, who have a clear understanding of the complex workings of its political structure, its history, and its cultural nuances. In all due respect, I suspect that among the members of your team you have those with very distinct political agendas when it comes to the outcome of the Islamic Republic’s future in the world.
You must take a look and leverage those in this country who are capable of being neutral in respect in religion and past politics. I urge you to surround yourself with some of the great minds you have in the U.S. who are qualified to advise you in the best possible way.
In closing, President Obama, I ask from the bottom of my heart that you recognize the blood on the streets of Iran as a problem not just for Iran and not for the United States, but as a problem for our humanity. We cannot dance around these issues and when asked to respond chalk them up to not wanting to “meddle” with Iran’s internal processes. We are all watching how you support the Iranian people, Mr. President. Iranians outside and inside Iran watch. Residents of the U.S. watch, and I, Mr. President, as someone who supported your march to the White House, wait and watch to see how you help support democracy and freedom for the people of Iran.
In remembrance of all those who have given their lives for peace, freedom, and democracy, I remain forever grateful, Reza Mohajerinejad
International Alliance of Iranian Students
The protesters who are at this very moment disappearing from their homes at an alarming rate, face a terror that is unfathomable. I have lived a version of what they are going through, and I can tell you firsthand that those of us who have been tortured in Iranian prisons will live the rest of our lives with the physical and mental scars we incurred at the hands of our torturers. Those being arrested at this time are being used as examples, and they face the most vicious treatment. As ugly as it is, I feel as someone who lived through this that I must give you a view of what current prisoners face. It is likely that the capture will include a fairly violent beating before prisoners have been taken into the jail.
Next the questioning will begin. Prisoners will be interrogated night and day, and many will lose touch with time, not even knowing how many days have passed. The torturers will likely use one of their most common torture methods, beating the bottoms of prisoners' feet with some a plastic cord. When I first heard about this sort of torture before I experienced it, I couldn’t imagine that hitting the bottoms of the feet could cause such pain. In reality there are so many nerve ending in the feet that after the first couple of blows, the pain is no longer centralized in the feet but goes all over the body. They will question the prisoners between blows asking for names of others who worked against Islam. They will sit on their backs as they continue beating their feet. After each session they will take the victims outside where they will be forced to jump on their throbbing bloody feet for twenty minutes or more. This is done so that blood comes back into the feet and the healing begins. The torturers believe that as the body begins to regenerate, it ensures that the next beatings will be even more painful than the last. The torture rooms are often intentionally kept dark and along the top of the walls they will have a large metal pipe that runs the length of the ceiling and is sturdy enough to hold the weight of the prisoner. This was where they practice a torture method called Ghapani. The victim puts one arm over his or her shoulder, reaches around and grabs the other wrist from the waist. The wrists are then secured, either with a rope or handcuffs, and the victim is hung from the ceiling by the wrists. The pain is excruciating. There are no words to describe it. Between these beatings prisoners will be placed in solitary confinement to await their next interrogation. The cells are usually nothing more than small closets with a single light bulb hanging from the ceiling that burns 24 hours a day.
A favorite means of psychological torture is to make prisoners watch the torture sessions of their friends and family. I recall a brother and sister who were in Tohid Prison with me (a prison that has since been closed and made into a museum), and the brother was forced to watch as his sister was repeatedly raped. I was in jail with two close friends, Manouchehr and Akbar Mohammadi. The interrogators would often have us watch each other being tortured. Akbar died in Evin Prison in 2006. In the end, I lost many friends who were seeking non-violence and a secular, democratic Iran, at hands of Iran’s prison system. As gruesome as the images are that I have just described, I believe a president who believes in protecting human rights must have an understanding of what is at stake, and for this reason I have shared my experiences.
Over the last few weeks I’ve been concerned by your reaction to the happenings in Iran. In all honesty, my sense is that you don’t have very strong advisors on Iran, or that those you do have are part of a political agenda that you may not completely grasp. I mean no disrespect by this, Mr. President, but I ask that you take a look at a few of the actions that in my mind, and in the minds of many Iranians, seems lacking focus or understanding about the current situation in Iran:
1. Letter to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Many in the Iranian community were shocked that an American president would send a letter to the Supreme Leader in the weeks preceding the election. While the content of the letter is still unclear, the message it sent to our community was that it didn’t matter who won, the U.S. would work with them. Given the outcome of the elections and the obvious fraud that took place, it would seem that the regime was given a carte blanche go-ahead to do whatever they wanted in the election, and that the U.S. would bless their actions. I hope this wasn’t the actual message, but surely, President Obama, you must admit that this was strategically the wrong message to send to the citizens of Iran who face the basiji thugs in the streets of Iran in the name of freedom and democracy.
2. Invitation of Iranian Diplomats to U.S. Embassy Fourth of July Parties: Several weeks back a cable went out to all U.S. Embassies and Consulates, saying the U.S. diplomats could invite their counterparts from the Islamic Republic of Iran to their Fourth of July celebrations. The invitations have since been retracted—in an of itself an Iranian cultural faux pas that is considered rude at best. The real issue here is, Mr. President, how could anyone have advised you that inviting the Islamic Republic of Iran to a celebration of Independence Day in the U.S. was a good idea? This is a fundamentalist regime that has no respect for human rights or independence of any kind. The message that these invitations sent to the Iranian people is that the U.S. accepts the regime and all its cruelty.
3. U.S. President’s Reaction to Khamenei’s June 19 Declaration: During Friday prayers on June 19, 2009, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issued a warning to peaceful protesters that they would not be tolerated. This warning was in truth, a death sentence to protesters. It gave basiji thugs the go-ahead to shoot protesters at will and take prisoners based on little or no evidence. Mr. President, you must have known what this proclamation meant to human rights in Iran, yet your reaction was tepid at best. You issued a statement that you were “very concerned,” while reporters had to literally pull details out of your spokesman, Robert Gibb, who finally conceded that you “condemned the violence” used against protesters.
Mr. President, people are being flung off of bridges, shot with hunting rifles from rooftops and beaten with clubs and axes until their bones are broken and they are bleeding in the streets. The injured are being taken from hospitals and put in prisons, and basijisare pulling people from their homes in the middle of the night to be taken in for hours of questioning and torture.
Thousands of innocent people who are starved for democracy and freedom are sitting in prisons, unsure of their futures, unsure if they will live another day. They are young, old, male, female, upper, middle and working class, educated, uneducated, and illiterate. They are professors, doctors, bazaaris, and laborers. The cruelty of the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran cares not at all for their background, but rules with equality when it comes to its barbaric acts against its citizens.
President Obama, please take a moment to consider the following: 1. For the last eight years the U.S. president repeatedly said he supported the people of Iran, but behind that support was an unspoken threat of military violence. He grouped our country as part of the “Axis of Evil” to justify veiled threats that “All options were on the table.” I did not support military action against my country then, and I still don’t today. In July of 2006 I was the first Iranian to organize an anti-war against Iran rally. But three years later, some sort of protection must be offered to the innocent people on the streets of Iran. This is the job of the United Nations, yet Ban Ki-Moon has been no stronger in his call to action than you have. Mr. President, you must push the U.N. on this. It is a human rights issue, and if Ban Ki-Moon is following your lead, it is imperative to remind him of the very charter of the U.N. to promote peace, freedom and "reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights."
2. The U.S. cannot recognize the fraudulent elections of June 12, 2009. Mahmoud Ahmadenejad is not the elected president, and for the U.S. to respond to him as such gives further strength to Khamenei’s dictatorship.
3. Mr. President, you must take this opportunity to evaluate your team of advisors on Iran policy. In this country we literally have the best and brightest academic minds from Iran. These are people who were born in Iran, who have a clear understanding of the complex workings of its political structure, its history, and its cultural nuances. In all due respect, I suspect that among the members of your team you have those with very distinct political agendas when it comes to the outcome of the Islamic Republic’s future in the world.
You must take a look and leverage those in this country who are capable of being neutral in respect in religion and past politics. I urge you to surround yourself with some of the great minds you have in the U.S. who are qualified to advise you in the best possible way.
In closing, President Obama, I ask from the bottom of my heart that you recognize the blood on the streets of Iran as a problem not just for Iran and not for the United States, but as a problem for our humanity. We cannot dance around these issues and when asked to respond chalk them up to not wanting to “meddle” with Iran’s internal processes. We are all watching how you support the Iranian people, Mr. President. Iranians outside and inside Iran watch. Residents of the U.S. watch, and I, Mr. President, as someone who supported your march to the White House, wait and watch to see how you help support democracy and freedom for the people of Iran.
In remembrance of all those who have given their lives for peace, freedom, and democracy, I remain forever grateful, Reza Mohajerinejad
International Alliance of Iranian Students
Yeah..And then we have the comment for today..
Death to the religous leader *bip*....and watch out for the punk *bip* CIA they love this kind of sh*t. They use this kind of sh*t to embed themselves deeper into other nations affairs. *BIP* the CIA!!!!! MI6 and MOSSAD ....and any other of those *bips*. *BIP* THEM ALL!!!!! 1
So...
Some mass murdering psychopaths claim those saying God is great are "enemies of God" ( and "Iran")..
Then..Those claiming those saying God is great are "enemies of God".. WHAT makes that those?
Then..Those claiming those saying God is great are "enemies of God".. WHAT makes that those?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
